Lucija Ciric Bagaric vs Ana Konjuh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Ciric Bagaric vs A. Konjuh

Lucija Ciric Bagaric
CRO
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
27
-
Height
1.74m
416
C. Rank
573
157
Best Rank
20
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$125.0K
Career Money
$1.9M
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Ana Konjuh
CRO
l
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
27
-
Height
1.74m
416
C. Rank
573
157
Best Rank
20
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$125.0K
Career Money
$1.9M
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Bagaric 1 - 0 Konjuh
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lucija Ciric Bagaric winning 2 and Ana Konjuh winning 1. The last match between Lucija Ciric Bagaric and Ana Konjuh was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Lucija Ciric Bagaric getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bagaric | 1 |
| Konjuh | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Manchester(02-18-25)
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
6
3
6
Ana Konjuh
2
6
3
L. C. Bagaric vs A. Konjuh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $125,000 | Career Prize Money | $1,940,308 |
| 60.43% (142-93) | Career Total W/L | 59.04% (284-197) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
L. C. Bagaric vs A. Konjuh Match Preview:
Recently, in the realm of second serve performance, there has been an intriguing comparison between Konjuh and Bagaric. Over the past six months, Konjuh has exhibited a commendable 44.48% success rate in winning points on their second serve, while Bagaric boasts a slightly lower but still impressive 43.32%. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Delving further into the realm of return game statistics in recent matches, our attention is drawn to Konjuh. Demonstrating excellent form, Konjuh has triumphed in 51.1% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Bagaric has managed a slightly higher success rate of 52.8%. For first serve returns, Konjuh's proficiency stands at 36.59%, whereas Bagaric boasts a slightly superior rate of 38.04%. These statistics play a pivotal role in determining the favored contender in their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
When it comes to handling pressure situations, Konjuh has exhibited remarkable resilience by saving 61.64% of breakpoints in recent encounters. Bagaric, while not far behind, has managed to save 56.42%, making this a particularly useful statistic for astute in-game betting predictions.
A comprehensive overview of their performance in the last year provides us with valuable insights. Konjuh has emerged victorious in 53.13% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 17-15, while Bagaric has achieved a 52% win rate, with a win-loss record of 26-24. These figures contribute to our overall prediction of their head-to-head matchup.
Examining their performance on various surfaces, it becomes apparent that Konjuh thrives on grass courts, boasting an extraordinary win percentage of 63% (27 victories and 16 losses). In contrast, their performance on hard courts is slightly inferior, with a win rate of 56% (95 victories and 75 losses). Bagaric, on the other hand, excels on hard courts, achieving an exceptional win percentage of 75% (27 victories and 9 losses). However, their skills wane on grass courts, resulting in a disappointing win percentage of 0% (0 victories and 1 loss).
Considering the level at which players have competed, it is worth noting that Konjuh has primarily participated in Challengers and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. In this context, they have triumphed in 57.69% of matches (15 wins and 11 losses). Similarly, Bagaric has predominantly played in Challengers and ITF tournaments with a comparable prize threshold, achieving a success rate of 51.28% (20 wins and 19 losses). It is crucial to contextualize these statistics accurately when predicting the favored player, as their performance largely depends on the event level they have been engaged in.
Considering the level of their opponents, it becomes evident that Konjuh has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 334.94 over the past year. On the other hand, Bagaric has encountered players with an average ranking of 280.04. This data sheds light on the caliber of opponents each player has faced recently.
For those interested in live predictions and betting opportunities, it is pertinent to evaluate players' performance in deciding sets. Over the past year, Konjuh has emerged victorious in 44% of deciding sets, showcasing their ability to perform well under pressure. Bagaric, meanwhile, has achieved a slightly better win percentage of 53% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide valuable insights for those engaged in in-game live betting.
While it is undoubtedly beneficial to consider players' past performance when predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to examine their current event statistics to gauge their current form. Special attention should be paid to the section below for up-to-date information on player performance in the ongoing event. Furthermore, some players tend to excel in specific events, and this should be taken into account to determine the potential outcome.
Break point conversion rates are also crucial in evaluating players' performance. Based on recent form, Konjuh has successfully converted 47.59% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Bagaric has achieved a conversion rate of 46.2% when striving to break their opponents' serve. These statistics prove invaluable for those seeking expert guidance in in-game live betting situations.
If you have an inclination towards models that predict tennis match outcomes, this article provides an excellent starting point. Be advised, though, that this resource is primarily tailored for statistics enthusiasts.
Lucija Ciric Bagaric vs Ana Konjuh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. C. Bagaric vs A. Konjuh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:20:31 | Average Match Time | 2:20:31 |
| 53% (55/103) | 1st Serve % | 65% (58/89) |
| 64% (35/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (38/58) |
| 60% (29/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 42% (37/89) | Return Points Win % | 38% (39/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bagaric 46%, Konjuh 40%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bagaric 56%, Konjuh 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Bagaric 49%, Konjuh 51%.
L. C. Bagaric Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 4-0 ret. | ||
A. Konjuh Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 1-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
F | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

L. C. Bagaric vs A. Konjuh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.43% (142/93) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.04% (284/197) |
| 58.29% (320/229) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.11% (629/492) |
| 53.37% (2727/2383) | Games Win/Loss | 52.21% (5434/4973) |
| 75.00% (27/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.23% (95/77) |
| 59.74% (92/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.84% (87/56) |
| 52.27% (23/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.98% (75/46) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (27/18) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 1780 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 740 | Total Double Faults | 2089 |
| 1:42:47 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 458.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.48 |
| 61% (9641/15774) | 1st Serve % | 56% (15776/27964) |
| 61% (5910/9641) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (10920/15776) |
| 45% (2766/6133) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5335/12181) |
| 50% (1065/2145) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1425/3147) |
| 48% (7707/16142) | Return Points Win % | 43% (11986/27807) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 56.72% (38/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 39.29% (22/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63.16% (12/7) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 58.44% (90/64) |
| 57.78% (104/76) | Challenger W/L | 64.38% (103/57) |
| 72.73% (32/12) | Futures W/L | 76.00% (19/6) |
| 60% (139/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (277/467) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (25/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (65/118) |
| 53% (44/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (104/171) |
| 87% (136/118) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (257/228) |
| 13% (136/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (257/28) |
| 24% (99/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (224/55) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction12:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:15 PM 15/11/25
Prediction11:00 PM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Liam Broady vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
16:15
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
14:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal